Wishlist
Dark Brown Leather Watch
$200.00 $180.00
Dining Chair
$300.00 $220.00
Creative Wooden Stand
$100.00 $80.00
Dark Brown Leather Watch
$200.00 $180.00
Creative Wooden Stand
$200.00 $180.00
In 2012, the energy sector in the United States was demanding major reform. Prices of oil and gas had continued to cripple the middle and lower class as the U.S. economy slowly recovered. At the same time, the U.S. lagged behind developed economies in production of renewable energy. The acceptance of climate change remained a partisan issue. The development of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) promised an abundance of accessible, cheap, domestically produced natural gas, but the cost to the environment remained a point of debate. As incumbent Democratic President Barack Obama faced Republican opponent Mitt Romney in the 2012 election, their (and their parties) stances on energy policy and the environment differed in several major areas. The results of the election would shape the country's energy policy for at least the next four years, and potentially create enough momentum to set energy policy of the United States for many years to come.
100% money back guarantee if the quality doesn't match the promise
If the work we produce contain plagiarism then we payback 1000 USD
All your payments are secure with Paypal security.
We provide 300 words per page unlike competitors' 250 or 275
Free Title Page, Citation Page, References, Exhibits, Revision, Charts
Case study solutions are career defining. Order your custom solution now.
Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy is a Harvard Business (HBR) Case Study on Global Business , Texas Business School provides HBR case study assignment help for just $9. Texas Business School(TBS) case study solution is based on HBR Case Study Method framework, TBS expertise & global insights. Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy is designed and drafted in a manner to allow the HBR case study reader to analyze a real-world problem by putting reader into the position of the decision maker. Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy case study will help professionals, MBA, EMBA, and leaders to develop a broad and clear understanding of casecategory challenges. Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy will also provide insight into areas such as – wordlist , strategy, leadership, sales and marketing, and negotiations.
Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy case study solution is focused on solving the strategic and operational challenges the protagonist of the case is facing. The challenges involve – evaluation of strategic options, key role of Global Business, leadership qualities of the protagonist, and dynamics of the external environment. The challenge in front of the protagonist, of Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy, is to not only build a competitive position of the organization but also to sustain it over a period of time.
The Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy case study solution requires the MBA, EMBA, executive, professional to have a deep understanding of various strategic management tools such as SWOT Analysis, PESTEL Analysis / PEST Analysis / STEP Analysis, Porter Five Forces Analysis, Go To Market Strategy, BCG Matrix Analysis, Porter Value Chain Analysis, Ansoff Matrix Analysis, VRIO / VRIN and Marketing Mix Analysis.
In the Texas Business School, Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy case study solution – following strategic tools are used - SWOT Analysis, PESTEL Analysis / PEST Analysis / STEP Analysis, Porter Five Forces Analysis, Go To Market Strategy, BCG Matrix Analysis, Porter Value Chain Analysis, Ansoff Matrix Analysis, VRIO / VRIN and Marketing Mix Analysis.
We have additionally used the concept of supply chain management and leadership framework to build a comprehensive case study solution for the case – Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy
The first step to solve HBR Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy case study solution is to identify the problem present in the case. The problem statement of the case is provided in the beginning of the case where the protagonist is contemplating various options in the face of numerous challenges that Energy Romney is facing right now. Even though the problem statement is essentially – “Global Business” challenge but it has impacted by others factors such as communication in the organization, uncertainty in the external environment, leadership in Energy Romney, style of leadership and organization structure, marketing and sales, organizational behavior, strategy, internal politics, stakeholders priorities and more.
Texas Business School approach of case study analysis – Conclusion, Reasons, Evidences - provides a framework to analyze every HBR case study. It requires conducting robust external environmental analysis to decipher evidences for the reasons presented in the Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy.
The external environment analysis of Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy will ensure that we are keeping a tab on the macro-environment factors that are directly and indirectly impacting the business of the firm.
PESTEL stands for political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors that impact the external environment of firm in Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy case study. PESTEL analysis of " Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy" can help us understand why the organization is performing badly, what are the factors in the external environment that are impacting the performance of the organization, and how the organization can either manage or mitigate the impact of these external factors.
As mentioned above PESTEL Analysis has six elements – political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal. All the six elements are explained in context with Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy macro-environment and how it impacts the businesses of the firm.
To do comprehensive PESTEL analysis of case study – Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy , we have researched numerous components under the six factors of PESTEL analysis.
Political factors impact seven key decision making areas – economic environment, socio-cultural environment, rate of innovation & investment in research & development, environmental laws, legal requirements, and acceptance of new technologies.
Government policies have significant impact on the business environment of any country. The firm in “ Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy ” needs to navigate these policy decisions to create either an edge for itself or reduce the negative impact of the policy as far as possible.
Data safety laws – The countries in which Energy Romney is operating, firms are required to store customer data within the premises of the country. Energy Romney needs to restructure its IT policies to accommodate these changes. In the EU countries, firms are required to make special provision for privacy issues and other laws.
Competition Regulations – Numerous countries have strong competition laws both regarding the monopoly conditions and day to day fair business practices. Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy has numerous instances where the competition regulations aspects can be scrutinized.
Import restrictions on products – Before entering the new market, Energy Romney in case study Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy" should look into the import restrictions that may be present in the prospective market.
Export restrictions on products – Apart from direct product export restrictions in field of technology and agriculture, a number of countries also have capital controls. Energy Romney in case study “ Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy ” should look into these export restrictions policies.
Foreign Direct Investment Policies – Government policies favors local companies over international policies, Energy Romney in case study “ Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy ” should understand in minute details regarding the Foreign Direct Investment policies of the prospective market.
Corporate Taxes – The rate of taxes is often used by governments to lure foreign direct investments or increase domestic investment in a certain sector. Corporate taxation can be divided into two categories – taxes on profits and taxes on operations. Taxes on profits number is important for companies that already have a sustainable business model, while taxes on operations is far more significant for companies that are looking to set up new plants or operations.
Tariffs – Chekout how much tariffs the firm needs to pay in the “ Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy ” case study. The level of tariffs will determine the viability of the business model that the firm is contemplating. If the tariffs are high then it will be extremely difficult to compete with the local competitors. But if the tariffs are between 5-10% then Energy Romney can compete against other competitors.
Research and Development Subsidies and Policies – Governments often provide tax breaks and other incentives for companies to innovate in various sectors of priority. Managers at Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy case study have to assess whether their business can benefit from such government assistance and subsidies.
Consumer protection – Different countries have different consumer protection laws. Managers need to clarify not only the consumer protection laws in advance but also legal implications if the firm fails to meet any of them.
Political System and Its Implications – Different political systems have different approach to free market and entrepreneurship. Managers need to assess these factors even before entering the market.
Freedom of Press is critical for fair trade and transparency. Countries where freedom of press is not prevalent there are high chances of both political and commercial corruption.
Corruption level – Energy Romney needs to assess the level of corruptions both at the official level and at the market level, even before entering a new market. To tackle the menace of corruption – a firm should have a clear SOP that provides managers at each level what to do when they encounter instances of either systematic corruption or bureaucrats looking to take bribes from the firm.
Independence of judiciary – It is critical for fair business practices. If a country doesn’t have independent judiciary then there is no point entry into such a country for business.
Government attitude towards trade unions – Different political systems and government have different attitude towards trade unions and collective bargaining. The firm needs to assess – its comfort dealing with the unions and regulations regarding unions in a given market or industry. If both are on the same page then it makes sense to enter, otherwise it doesn’t.
PESTEL stands for political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors that impact the external environment of firm in Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy case study. PESTEL analysis of " Romney vs. Obama and U.S. Energy Policy" can help us understand why the organization is performing badly, what are the factors in the external environment that are impacting the performance of the organization, and how the organization can either manage or mitigate the impact of these external factors.
Amanda Watson
Amanda is strategy expert at Texas Business School . She is passionate about corporate strategy, competitive strategy, game theory, and business model innovation. You can hire Texas Business School professinoals to revolutionize your strategy & business.
© 2019
Texas Business School. All Rights Reserved
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news on update.
$360.00 $300.00
Hurley Dry-Fit Chino Short. Men's chino short. Outseam Length: 19 Dri-FIT Technology helps keep you dry and comfortable. Made with sweat-wicking fabric. Fitted waist with belt loops. Button waist with zip fly provides a classic look and feel .
Quantity:SKU: | 12345 |
Categories: | Fashion, Men, Sunglasses |
Tags: | Fashion, Men |
Share on: |