Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) Description

In the spring of 1998, nonprofit agencies known as "child-sponsorship" organizations found themselves on the defensive. The agencies-dedicated to raising charitable funds in the United States to support children and their communities in poor, developing countries-had been the subject of a scathing critique, a two-part series in the Chicago Tribune accusing them, in effect, of misleading donors. The series asserted that the organizations had not lived up to the promise implicit in fundraising advertisements: that specific children would benefit directly from the contributions of individual sponsors. The agencies mounted a spirited and largely successful public defense of their approach-one in which aid was targeted not only at individual children but at the communities in which they lived. At the same time, however, they sought new ways to reassure the public about their effectiveness. This case details the ensuing effort by a group of six child sponsorship agencies to agree on "industry" standards that would make their goals and methods clear. The case describes the differing situations of the various organizations so as to lay the groundwork for discussion about likely difficulties in reaching agreement on standards, as well as extrapolation as to what sort of standards could both command consensus among the agencies and satisfy public demands for "transparency." The case serves the broader purpose of framing the issues and dynamics of industry self-regulation more generally, particularly in a nonprofit context. See also, Part B (1665.0). HKS Case Number 1664.0

Case Description Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Strategic Managment Tools Used in Case Study Analysis of Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

STEP 1. Problem Identification in Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study

STEP 2. External Environment Analysis - PESTEL / PEST / STEP Analysis of Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study

STEP 3. Industry Specific / Porter Five Forces Analysis of Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study

STEP 4. Evaluating Alternatives / SWOT Analysis of Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study

STEP 5. Porter Value Chain Analysis / VRIO / VRIN Analysis Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study

STEP 6. Recommendations Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study

STEP 7. Basis of Recommendations for Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study

Case Analysis of Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) is a Harvard Business (HBR) Case Study on Leadership & Managing People , Texas Business School provides HBR case study assignment help for just $9. Texas Business School(TBS) case study solution is based on HBR Case Study Method framework, TBS expertise & global insights. Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) is designed and drafted in a manner to allow the HBR case study reader to analyze a real-world problem by putting reader into the position of the decision maker. Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study will help professionals, MBA, EMBA, and leaders to develop a broad and clear understanding of casecategory challenges. Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) will also provide insight into areas such as – wordlist , strategy, leadership, sales and marketing, and negotiations.

Case Study Solutions Background Work

Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study solution is focused on solving the strategic and operational challenges the protagonist of the case is facing. The challenges involve – evaluation of strategic options, key role of Leadership & Managing People, leadership qualities of the protagonist, and dynamics of the external environment. The challenge in front of the protagonist, of Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A), is to not only build a competitive position of the organization but also to sustain it over a period of time.

Strategic Management Tools Used in Case Study Solution

The Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study solution requires the MBA, EMBA, executive, professional to have a deep understanding of various strategic management tools such as SWOT Analysis, PESTEL Analysis / PEST Analysis / STEP Analysis, Porter Five Forces Analysis, Go To Market Strategy, BCG Matrix Analysis, Porter Value Chain Analysis, Ansoff Matrix Analysis, VRIO / VRIN and Marketing Mix Analysis.

Texas Business School Approach to Leadership & Managing People Solutions

In the Texas Business School, Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study solution – following strategic tools are used - SWOT Analysis, PESTEL Analysis / PEST Analysis / STEP Analysis, Porter Five Forces Analysis, Go To Market Strategy, BCG Matrix Analysis, Porter Value Chain Analysis, Ansoff Matrix Analysis, VRIO / VRIN and Marketing Mix Analysis.

We have additionally used the concept of supply chain management and leadership framework to build a comprehensive case study solution for the case – Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Step 1 – Problem Identification of Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) - Harvard Business School Case Study

The first step to solve HBR Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study solution is to identify the problem present in the case. The problem statement of the case is provided in the beginning of the case where the protagonist is contemplating various options in the face of numerous challenges that Agencies Child is facing right now. Even though the problem statement is essentially – “Leadership & Managing People” challenge but it has impacted by others factors such as communication in the organization, uncertainty in the external environment, leadership in Agencies Child, style of leadership and organization structure, marketing and sales, organizational behavior, strategy, internal politics, stakeholders priorities and more.

Step 2 – External Environment Analysis

Texas Business School approach of case study analysis – Conclusion, Reasons, Evidences - provides a framework to analyze every HBR case study. It requires conducting robust external environmental analysis to decipher evidences for the reasons presented in the Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A).

The external environment analysis of Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) will ensure that we are keeping a tab on the macro-environment factors that are directly and indirectly impacting the business of the firm.

What is PESTEL Analysis? Briefly Explained

PESTEL stands for political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors that impact the external environment of firm in Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study. PESTEL analysis of " Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)" can help us understand why the organization is performing badly, what are the factors in the external environment that are impacting the performance of the organization, and how the organization can either manage or mitigate the impact of these external factors.

How to do PESTEL / PEST / STEP Analysis? What are the components of PESTEL Analysis?

As mentioned above PESTEL Analysis has six elements – political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal. All the six elements are explained in context with Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) macro-environment and how it impacts the businesses of the firm.

How to do PESTEL Analysis for Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

To do comprehensive PESTEL analysis of case study – Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) , we have researched numerous components under the six factors of PESTEL analysis.

Political Factors that Impact Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Political factors impact seven key decision making areas – economic environment, socio-cultural environment, rate of innovation & investment in research & development, environmental laws, legal requirements, and acceptance of new technologies.

Policy Making Impact on Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Government policies have significant impact on the business environment of any country. The firm in “ Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) ” needs to navigate these policy decisions to create either an edge for itself or reduce the negative impact of the policy as far as possible.

Data safety laws – The countries in which Agencies Child is operating, firms are required to store customer data within the premises of the country. Agencies Child needs to restructure its IT policies to accommodate these changes. In the EU countries, firms are required to make special provision for privacy issues and other laws.

Competition Regulations – Numerous countries have strong competition laws both regarding the monopoly conditions and day to day fair business practices. Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) has numerous instances where the competition regulations aspects can be scrutinized.

Import restrictions on products – Before entering the new market, Agencies Child in case study Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)" should look into the import restrictions that may be present in the prospective market.

Export restrictions on products – Apart from direct product export restrictions in field of technology and agriculture, a number of countries also have capital controls. Agencies Child in case study “ Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) ” should look into these export restrictions policies.

Foreign Direct Investment Policies – Government policies favors local companies over international policies, Agencies Child in case study “ Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) ” should understand in minute details regarding the Foreign Direct Investment policies of the prospective market.

Taxation & Regulation Impact on Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Corporate Taxes – The rate of taxes is often used by governments to lure foreign direct investments or increase domestic investment in a certain sector. Corporate taxation can be divided into two categories – taxes on profits and taxes on operations. Taxes on profits number is important for companies that already have a sustainable business model, while taxes on operations is far more significant for companies that are looking to set up new plants or operations.

Tariffs – Chekout how much tariffs the firm needs to pay in the “ Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) ” case study. The level of tariffs will determine the viability of the business model that the firm is contemplating. If the tariffs are high then it will be extremely difficult to compete with the local competitors. But if the tariffs are between 5-10% then Agencies Child can compete against other competitors.

Government Scheme & Subsidies Impact on Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Research and Development Subsidies and Policies – Governments often provide tax breaks and other incentives for companies to innovate in various sectors of priority. Managers at Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study have to assess whether their business can benefit from such government assistance and subsidies.

Consumer protection – Different countries have different consumer protection laws. Managers need to clarify not only the consumer protection laws in advance but also legal implications if the firm fails to meet any of them.

Political System & Stability, and its Impact on Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Political System and Its Implications – Different political systems have different approach to free market and entrepreneurship. Managers need to assess these factors even before entering the market.

Freedom of Press is critical for fair trade and transparency. Countries where freedom of press is not prevalent there are high chances of both political and commercial corruption.

Corruption level – Agencies Child needs to assess the level of corruptions both at the official level and at the market level, even before entering a new market. To tackle the menace of corruption – a firm should have a clear SOP that provides managers at each level what to do when they encounter instances of either systematic corruption or bureaucrats looking to take bribes from the firm.

Independence of judiciary – It is critical for fair business practices. If a country doesn’t have independent judiciary then there is no point entry into such a country for business.

Government attitude towards trade unions – Different political systems and government have different attitude towards trade unions and collective bargaining. The firm needs to assess – its comfort dealing with the unions and regulations regarding unions in a given market or industry. If both are on the same page then it makes sense to enter, otherwise it doesn’t.

Economic Factors that Impact Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Social Factors that Impact Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Technological Factors that Impact Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Environmental Factors that Impact Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Legal Factors that Impact Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)

Step 3 – Industry Specific Analysis

What is Porter Five Forces Analysis

PESTEL stands for political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors that impact the external environment of firm in Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study. PESTEL analysis of " Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A)" can help us understand why the organization is performing badly, what are the factors in the external environment that are impacting the performance of the organization, and how the organization can either manage or mitigate the impact of these external factors.

Step 4 – SWOT Analysis / Internal Environment Analysis

Step 5 – Porter Value Chain / VRIO / VRIN Analysis

Step 6 – Evaluating Alternatives & Recommendations

Step 7 – Basis for Recommendations

References :: Standards for Child Sponsorship Agencies (A) case study solution