Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) Description
After the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, President George W. Bush launched a military offensive in Afghanistan, which led to the capture of Al Qaeda operatives thought to be behind the attacks. Top US officials debated how to extract crucial information from them about Al Qaeda's future plans. The Central Intelligence Agency wanted to apply aggressive interrogation methods, which it argued were necessary to convince detainees to reveal what they knew. But CIA officials worried such techniques might violate both international treaties banning torture and "cruel, inhuman or degrading" treatment of prisoners of war and detainees and, more consequentially, the domestic laws that enforced them. To protect its agents, the CIA sought a clear statement from the Bush Administration on how far agents could go in efforts to force detainees to talk. These cases tell the story of OLC's legal findings and their consequences. Part A (1853.0)describes a series of OLC memoranda on the treatment of detainees in the "war on terror," culminating in an August 2002 opinion that became known as the "torture memo," which narrowly interpreted the legal meaning of torture but took a broad view of presidential wartime powers under the Constitution. Part A ends as Assistant Attorney General and OLC head Jay Bybee must decide whether to sign the opinion. Part B (1854.0) tracks the results of the torture memo, tracing the use of interrogation techniques it sanctioned from CIA detention centers overseas to the naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. In the view of some, these harsher techniques eventually "migrated" to Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, where abusive treatment of detainees became an international embarrassment for the US. HKS Case Number 1854.1
100% money back guarantee if the quality doesn't match the promise
100% Plagiarism Free
If the work we produce contain plagiarism then we payback 1000 USD
Paypal Secure
All your payments are secure with Paypal security.
300 Words per Page
We provide 300 words per page unlike competitors' 250 or 275
Freebies
Free Title Page, Citation Page, References, Exhibits, Revision, Charts
Case study solutions are career defining. Order your custom solution now.
Case Analysis of Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) is a Harvard Business (HBR) Case Study on Strategy & Execution , Texas Business School provides HBR case study assignment help for just $9. Texas Business School(TBS) case study solution is based on HBR Case Study Method framework, TBS expertise & global insights. Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) is designed and drafted in a manner to allow the HBR case study reader to analyze a real-world problem by putting reader into the position of the decision maker. Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) case study will help professionals, MBA, EMBA, and leaders to develop a broad and clear understanding of casecategory challenges. Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) will also provide insight into areas such as – wordlist , strategy, leadership, sales and marketing, and negotiations.
Case Study Solutions Background Work
Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
case study solution
is focused on solving the strategic and operational challenges the protagonist of the case is facing. The challenges involve – evaluation of strategic options, key role of Strategy & Execution, leadership qualities of the protagonist, and dynamics of the external environment. The challenge in front of the protagonist, of Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel), is to not only build a competitive position of the organization but also to sustain it over a period of time.
Strategic Management Tools Used in Case Study Solution
The Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) case study solution requires the MBA, EMBA, executive, professional to have a deep understanding of various strategic management tools such as SWOT Analysis, PESTEL Analysis / PEST Analysis / STEP Analysis, Porter Five Forces Analysis, Go To Market Strategy, BCG Matrix Analysis, Porter Value Chain Analysis, Ansoff Matrix Analysis, VRIO / VRIN and Marketing Mix Analysis.
Texas Business School Approach to Strategy & Execution Solutions
In the Texas Business School, Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) case study solution – following strategic tools are used - SWOT Analysis, PESTEL Analysis / PEST Analysis / STEP Analysis, Porter Five Forces Analysis, Go To Market Strategy, BCG Matrix Analysis, Porter Value Chain Analysis, Ansoff Matrix Analysis, VRIO / VRIN and Marketing Mix Analysis.
We have additionally used the concept of supply chain management and leadership framework to build a comprehensive case study solution for the case – Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Step 1 – Problem Identification of Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) - Harvard Business School Case Study
The first step to solve HBR Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) case study solution is to identify the problem present in the case. The problem statement of the case is provided in the beginning of the case where the protagonist is contemplating various options in the face of numerous challenges that Detainees Torture is facing right now. Even though the problem statement is essentially – “Strategy & Execution” challenge but it has impacted by others factors such as communication in the organization, uncertainty in the external environment, leadership in Detainees Torture, style of leadership and organization structure, marketing and sales, organizational behavior, strategy, internal politics, stakeholders priorities and more.
Step 2 – External Environment Analysis
Texas Business School approach of case study analysis – Conclusion, Reasons, Evidences - provides a framework to analyze every HBR case study. It requires conducting robust external environmental analysis to decipher evidences for the reasons presented in the Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel).
The external environment analysis of Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) will ensure that we are keeping a tab on the macro-environment factors that are directly and indirectly impacting the business of the firm.
What is PESTEL Analysis? Briefly Explained
PESTEL stands for political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors that impact the external environment of firm in Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) case study. PESTEL analysis of " Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)" can help us understand why the organization is performing badly, what are the factors in the external environment that are impacting the performance of the organization, and how the organization can either manage or mitigate the impact of these external factors.
How to do PESTEL / PEST / STEP Analysis? What are the components of PESTEL Analysis?
As mentioned above PESTEL Analysis has six elements – political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal. All the six elements are explained in context with Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) macro-environment and how it impacts the businesses of the firm.
How to do PESTEL Analysis for Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
To do comprehensive PESTEL analysis of case study – Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) , we have researched numerous components under the six factors of PESTEL analysis.
Political Factors that Impact Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Political factors impact seven key decision making areas – economic environment, socio-cultural environment, rate of innovation & investment in research & development, environmental laws, legal requirements, and acceptance of new technologies.
Policy Making Impact on Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Government policies have significant impact on the business environment of any country. The firm in “ Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) ” needs to navigate these policy decisions to create either an edge for itself or reduce the negative impact of the policy as far as possible.
Data safety laws – The countries in which Detainees Torture is operating, firms are required to store customer data within the premises of the country. Detainees Torture needs to restructure its IT policies to accommodate these changes. In the EU countries, firms are required to make special provision for privacy issues and other laws.
Competition Regulations – Numerous countries have strong competition laws both regarding the monopoly conditions and day to day fair business practices. Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) has numerous instances where the competition regulations aspects can be scrutinized.
Import restrictions on products – Before entering the new market, Detainees Torture in case study Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)" should look into the import restrictions that may be present in the prospective market.
Export restrictions on products – Apart from direct product export restrictions in field of technology and agriculture, a number of countries also have capital controls. Detainees Torture in case study “ Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) ” should look into these export restrictions policies.
Foreign Direct Investment Policies – Government policies favors local companies over international policies, Detainees Torture in case study “ Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) ” should understand in minute details regarding the Foreign Direct Investment policies of the prospective market.
Taxation & Regulation Impact on Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Corporate Taxes – The rate of taxes is often used by governments to lure foreign direct investments or increase domestic investment in a certain sector. Corporate taxation can be divided into two categories – taxes on profits and taxes on operations. Taxes on profits number is important for companies that already have a sustainable business model, while taxes on operations is far more significant for companies that are looking to set up new plants or operations.
Tariffs – Chekout how much tariffs the firm needs to pay in the “ Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) ” case study. The level of tariffs will determine the viability of the business model that the firm is contemplating. If the tariffs are high then it will be extremely difficult to compete with the local competitors. But if the tariffs are between 5-10% then Detainees Torture can compete against other competitors.
Government Scheme & Subsidies Impact on Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Research and Development Subsidies and Policies – Governments often provide tax breaks and other incentives for companies to innovate in various sectors of priority. Managers at Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) case study have to assess whether their business can benefit from such government assistance and subsidies.
Consumer protection – Different countries have different consumer protection laws. Managers need to clarify not only the consumer protection laws in advance but also legal implications if the firm fails to meet any of them.
Political System & Stability, and its Impact on Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Political System and Its Implications – Different political systems have different approach to free market and entrepreneurship. Managers need to assess these factors even before entering the market.
Freedom of Press is critical for fair trade and transparency. Countries where freedom of press is not prevalent there are high chances of both political and commercial corruption.
Corruption level – Detainees Torture needs to assess the level of corruptions both at the official level and at the market level, even before entering a new market. To tackle the menace of corruption – a firm should have a clear SOP that provides managers at each level what to do when they encounter instances of either systematic corruption or bureaucrats looking to take bribes from the firm.
Independence of judiciary – It is critical for fair business practices. If a country doesn’t have independent judiciary then there is no point entry into such a country for business.
Government attitude towards trade unions – Different political systems and government have different attitude towards trade unions and collective bargaining. The firm needs to assess – its comfort dealing with the unions and regulations regarding unions in a given market or industry. If both are on the same page then it makes sense to enter, otherwise it doesn’t.
Economic Factors that Impact Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Social Factors that Impact Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Technological Factors that Impact Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Environmental Factors that Impact Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Legal Factors that Impact Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)
Step 3 – Industry Specific Analysis
What is Porter Five Forces Analysis
PESTEL stands for political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors that impact the external environment of firm in Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel) case study. PESTEL analysis of " Defining Torture in the War on Terror (Sequel)" can help us understand why the organization is performing badly, what are the factors in the external environment that are impacting the performance of the organization, and how the organization can either manage or mitigate the impact of these external factors.
Amanda is strategy expert at Texas Business School. She is passionate about corporate strategy, competitive strategy, game theory, and business model innovation. You can hire Texas Business School professinoals to revolutionize your strategy & business.
Hurley Dry-Fit Chino Short. Men's chino short. Outseam Length: 19 Dri-FIT Technology helps keep you dry and comfortable. Made with sweat-wicking fabric. Fitted waist with belt loops. Button waist with zip fly provides a classic look and feel .
